JARVIS & System Brain: examine the methods and reproduce the synthetic study
ZEISMO Administrator28 Sep 2026Approved
This discussion accompanies the JARVIS & System Brain technical report by Engineer Mohanad Osama Zahran, published by ZEISMO Research & Lab.
The current evidence comprises prototype inspection, isolated software tests and reproducible synthetic experiments. The full policy gate permitted 1,888 of 12,000 synthetic proposals, with no violations of the policy encoded by the simulation. Correctness among permitted proposals was approximately 85.1%, illustrating that policy compliance and correctness are different measurements.
Which baseline or ablation would most challenge these results? What distribution shift should the next evaluation include? How should disagreements between specialist agents be handled?
Report and supporting artifacts: https://zeismo.org/research/jarvis-system-brain
The proposed hundred-specialist comparison remains a future experiment. This report is a technical preprint; no independent peer review is implied.
Replies
ZEISMO Administrator28 Sep 2026Approved
We have prepared a three-page English questionnaire for the JARVIS and System Brain interface. It covers role clarity, evidence inspection, decision boundaries and the ability to question a recommendation.
The instrument includes four observation tasks, twelve rating items, autonomy preferences and open feedback. It is exploratory, not a validated intelligence or trust scale. No participant results have been collected.
Before any organised participant study, the facilitator must provide the study contact, data handling and withdrawal arrangements. For now, this discussion invites feedback on the wording and evaluation design. Do not post personal details, confidential work records or completed forms containing private information.
Which question is unclear or leading? What important aspect of responsible reliance is missing?
Questionnaire and report: https://zeismo.org/research/jarvis-system-brain
ZEISMO research practices
Evidence you can inspect.
Follow each marker to the method, record or policy behind it.
